miu miu literary club | an interview with lou stoppard

Lou Stoppard has spent her career refusing to choose a lane, working as a writer, curator, critic, and moderator, and it’s precisely that restlessness that makes her one of culture’s most incisive interpreters. From her early days interviewing icons live on camera to profiling figures like Harry Styles, Stoppard has built a practice around a single, deceptively simple aim: to find something new in people the world thinks it already knows.

This year, she brought that same curiosity to the Miu Miu Literary Club, moderating a conversation on Annie Ernaux’s ‘A Girl’s Story’ under the theme “Politics of Desire.” Following in the Club’s lineage of spotlighting significant women writers — from Alba de Céspedes to Simone de Beauvoir — the discussion wove together journalism, feminist theory and literature to unpack Ernaux’s unsentimental, genre-defiant relationship to memory, shame and self-determination.

Stoppard talks to Schön! about the throughline connecting her writing and curatorial work, what she learned moderating a room of disparate literary voices, and why desire — why we want what we want — remains the question she can’t stop circling back to.

You’ve built a career moving between journalism, criticism, curation, and cultural programming. What skills have carried across all those disciplines, and how has your understanding of storytelling changed over time?

I would hope that curiosity is the trait that unites all my work. I’m pretty ambivalent about arbitrary distinctions between disciplines or forms of working – be it art, fashion or photography, or curating versus writing – and I tend to enjoy projects that blur these boundaries, or situate visual culture within broader socio-political contexts or understandings. I also very much enjoy working collaboratively, which is probably why I undertake curatorial or speaking work: it’s a welcome break from the lonely life of a writer!

You’ve interviewed some of the most closely watched public figures in culture, including musicians and actors whose lives are intensely mediated and there’s a mystification around them. When profiling someone like Harry Styles, how do you move beyond the public image to uncover something more revealing or human?

I’ve always said, since my earliest days of interviewing, when I was in my twenties and working at the moving image platform SHOWstudio and being given the amazing responsibility and access to interview cultural icons, often live on camera, that my only hope from an interview is to get something – just something – new from the person. So many public figures are interviewed so constantly that by default they start regurgitating the same anecdotes or answers, so my hope was – and still is – always to get something new, some fresh understanding – be that from something they said, or just an insight into them, from their demeanour: a moment of insecurity or nervousness or combativeness. I wanted to feel I’d broadened understandings of that person, and their cultural output.

Many of your interviews feel as interested in the cultural moment around a person as in the individual themselves. Do you see profiling as a form of cultural criticism as much as journalism?

Of course. Fame, popularity, relevance are so deeply reflective of the society that bestowed them. I’m fascinated in such moments, or movements – the trends, the obsessions, the moral panics, the shifts in norms, the cycles.

At this year’s Miu Miu Literary Club, you moderated a discussion on Annie Ernaux’s A Girl’s Story, focusing on desire, consent, memory, and self-determination. What aspects of Ernaux’s work felt especially resonant in 2026?

I think Annie’s work has galvanised a cross-generational readership, and she has inspired and engaged so many young writers because of her attention to social norms, hierarchies, class, patriarchy. To see a writer in her 80s speaking to so many women in their teens, twenties and thirties is really exciting. It mirrors, I think, a broader appreciation for the work of women artists of all ages. I think Ernaux’s form is groundbreaking and unique: that’s what has made her such an influence on so many contemporary authors.

She is undefinable, unlimited by genre or conventions of form, be it “autofiction” or “memoir”. I think that liberation is very freeing for writers today. Her form also reflects memory: we move, in our minds, between fiction and reality, what is hazy and what is definable. And she writes about life, sex, abortion, memory, shame in an entirely unsentimental way – bold in its flatness and clarity (“flat” is a term that Annie herself uses for her writing). I think that lack of sentimentality is radical.

The Literary Club draws inspiration from the tradition of literary salons while engaging contemporary political and social questions. As a moderator, how do you create space for disagreement and complexity without reducing conversations to simple positions?

That’s actually one of the things that I think is strongest about the Club: the commitment to weighty discussion, to debate and disagreement, as much as consensus. I see my role as a moderator as being about bringing together disparate literary voices – often from different generations and cultures – in a way that unites them without flattening the uniqueness of their perspectives or histories.

This year’s theme, “Politics of Desire,” explored the relationship between personal experience and larger structures of power. Did any insight from the discussions challenge or deepen your own thinking about desire, agency, or identity?

I was really interested in the part of the discussion where we considered Ernaux’s comments linking sex and writing, as acts. Annie’s project, as a writer, is often about trying to get as close to reality as possible, be that the reality of the girl of 58 in A Girl’s Story, or the realities of family members, of other past selves. In this act, this process of self-making, she writes about a parallel to orgasm. In Shame, she compares writing to orgasm, saying that during orgasm, as when writing, “her sense of identity and coherence is at its highest.” I asked the panellists what they made of Ernaux’s assertion, and about whether we could consider sex a creative act, or an act that mirrors or enables writing, and was curious about a theme that emerged in their responses: the idea of writing and sex as acts that involve searching, or grasping for some kind of resolution, or certainty, a moment of clarity, an end point, of sorts.

The panel on A Girl’s Story brought together voices from journalism, feminist theory, and literature. What do multidisciplinary conversations offer that more conventional literary discussions sometimes miss?

It’s simplistic, but broader perspectives and disciplines make for broader discussions. The blend also allows the literary club to contextualise writers and works within broader social, political and feminist histories.

Fashion houses are increasingly investing in intellectual and cultural programming. What do you think initiatives like the Miu Miu Literary Club can contribute to contemporary cultural discourse when they are done well?

I think the Club is an example of cultural programming done really, really well. The Club is committed to furthering discussion about significant female writers: it’s about sharing knowledge, spreading enthusiasm for amazing talent. Over the years, we have moved from Alba de Cespedes, through to Simone de Beauvoir and now Annie Ernaux: what a joy to have the task of rereading these writers so deeply. And how great to see a fashion brand investing in spotlighting and supporting female writing.

Looking across your work, from writing profiles and essays to curating and moderating public conversations, what kinds of stories or questions are you most interested in pursuing next, and where do you see the most exciting opportunities for cultural journalism today?

Fittingly, given the theme of this year’s Literary Club, I’m always interested in desire: why people want what they want, why they envy, why they return to certain obsessions or habits, what attracts them, what repels them. I think within these questions are fascinating opportunities for writing and debate.

Learn more about this edition of Miu Miu’s Literary Club at miumiu.com.

photography. Courtesy of Miu Miu
interview. Kelsey Barnes